Nancy Reynolds is a member of the Health Law, Litigation, and Medical Malpractice teams and works out of Woods Rogers’ Roanoke office. She joined the firm in January 2019. Her practice focuses primarily on the defense of long-term care companies in a variety of litigation areas such as medical malpractice, general negligence, premises liability, and contract disputes.
She has litigated cases as a first chair trial attorney in tort defense cases for over 20 years. Nancy understands how early case resolution benefits her clients and encourages mediation when appropriate. She is a trained mediator with experience guiding cases through the mediation process and defending cases in arbitrations. She works with her clients to determine the best course of action and uses the information gathered in litigation to evaluate and modify policies and practices.
Additionally, she has successfully represented medical providers before the Boards of Medicine, Nursing, Dentistry, Licensed Nursing Home Administrators and Pharmacy. She has represented oncologists, eye surgeons, optometrists, dentists, surgeons and other medical providers in medical malpractice litigation.
Nancy also provides advice to her long-term care clients on regulatory compliance; risk management with residents and families; and contents of resident admission, arbitration, and CCRC agreements.
Nancy graduated from the College of William & Mary and graduated with honors from The Ohio State University College of Law. Nancy has received the Award for Excellence and Innovation in Alternative Dispute Resolution from The Center for Public Resources Legal Program. She currently serves of the boards of the Virginia Women Attorney’s Association, the Ted Dalton American Inns of Court, and the Roanoke Bar Association.
Roanoke Bar Association
Ted Dalton American Inn of Court
Virginia Association of Defense Attorneys
Virginia Healthcare Association
Virginia Women Attorney’s Association
SNFs Face Troubling Trend Following Golden Gate Decision, McKnight’s Long Term Care News, November 26, 2018
Current News on Oyer Motions: A New Wrinkle for an Old Tool, The Journal of Civil Litigation, Virginia Association of Defense Attorneys, Vol. XXX, No. 3, Fall 2018
Salus Decision Offers a Golden Ticket to Some Long Term Care Facilities, McKnight’s Long Term Care News, March 14, 2018
As Demand Increases for Granny Cams, What Should LTC Facilities Do?, McKnight’s Long Term Care News, December 20, 2017
Avoiding Legal Claims in Assisted Living Facilities, I Advance Senior Care, February 10, 2017
The Negligence Duty of Assisted Living Facilities: Between A Rock and A Hard Place, 24 Health Law, Issue 7, December 2016
Defuse Disputes With Arbitration Clauses, Long Term Living, August 26, 2016
- Defense verdict in carpal tunnel surgery resulting in de Quervain’s syndrome case
- Defense verdict in oncologist failure to diagnose lung cancer metastasis case
- Defense verdict in appendix removal with artery laceration malpractice matter
- Resolved over 200 long term care negligence cases involving pressure ulcers, falls, medication errors and abuse resulting in personal injuries, including death
- Obtained decisions in more than 50 cases that internal policies and procedures cannot be used to establish a long term care facility’s negligence duty and breach of duty
- Successfully argued the Virginia opt-out statute for arbitration clauses in medical negligence cases is in violation of the Federal Arbitration Act
- Obtained dismissal under the workers’ compensation act of a 362 plaintiff hearing loss case
- Dismissal of federal antitrust litigation by pulmonologist denied hospital privileges
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Contracts’ Arbitrability Language | January 9, 2019
Highland Ridge Rehab Center | Personal Liability as a Healthcare Professional | June 20, 2019
Long Term Care and Senior Care Compliance, Risk Management, and Litigation Strategies Conference | Drafting Effective Arbitration Agreements that Will Withstand Attack | January 23, 2019
Lawyer case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case undertaken by the lawyer.