Chris Stevens’ areas of practice and services include commercial litigation, construction litigation, general civil litigation, insurance defense, personal injury, professional liability, business torts, and workers’ compensation. He represents lawyers in professional liability claims and physicians, veterinarians, dentists, and other professionals concerning licensing complaints.
Chris also represents developers, contractors, architects, and engineers in matters related to construction, insurance coverage, and personal injury claims.
The Roanoke native has been named in Best Lawyers in America for his work in insurance law and was cited by Virginia Business magazine as a Legal Elite in civil litigation.
Chris is a graduate of Hampden-Sydney College and the University of Richmond’s T.C. Williams School of Law.
Affiliations
Virginia State Bar—Bar Council Member (2007-10); Representative, 23rd Judicial Circuit
American Bar Association
The Ted Dalton America Inns of Court—Associate (2003-06)
Defense Research Institute
Virginia Association of Defense Attorneys
International Association of Defense Counsel
Thought Leadership
Claims by Organizational Plaintiffs Against Design Professionals, VADA Journal of Civil Litigation, Vol. XXVI, No. 3 (Fall 2014)
Featured Posts
Signed, Sealed, Delivered: Is Your 5+ Year Real Property Lease Enforceable? | November 13, 2018
Recognition
Thirty-nine Woods Rogers Attorneys Recognized by The Best Lawyers in America | August 16, 2018
Thirty-six Woods Rogers Attorneys Are Recognized by Best Lawyers in America | August 15, 2017
Twenty-seven Woods Rogers attorneys named by Virginia Business as 2016 “Legal Elite” | December 5, 2016
Thirty Woods Rogers Attorneys Recognized as 2017 The Best Lawyers in America | August 16, 2016
Thirty Woods Rogers Attorneys Recognized as 2016 Best Lawyers in America | August 19, 2015
Thirty-four Woods Rogers Attorneys Recognized as 2015 Best Lawyers in America | August 22, 2014
33 Attorneys Named Best Lawyers in America 2014 | August 15, 2013
Lawyer case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case undertaken by the lawyer.